Native American yin/yang

Posted: 26/05/2018 by zandtao in ONE planet
Tags:


Journey To The Heart

You Are a Perfect Balance of Yin and Yang

I trudged to the top of the mesa in Sedona. A woman I’d met had told me what to look for. There it was: a rock formation, a naturally formed statue. On the left side, the formation looked like a woman, an Egyptian goddess with necklace and breasts. On the right, it had taken the shape of a male. I found it immediately. A statue with two sides– one male, one female.

For many years, I denied the feminine part of God, of the universe, of myself. I thought my strength and my power had to come from other parts, other sides. I resented my femininity, raged about it, because I thought being feminine meant being helpless and powerless. But I’ve learned something along the way. There is power in the feminine and power in the masculine. Both parts are in us. Both parts are valuable.

Our strength, courage, protectiveness and feminine energy, the yin and the yang in yourself, the universe, the people around you. Both parts are important. Both can be trusted. Learn to let them work together in harmony.

Climb to the top of the mountain. Look around. See the perfect balance of masculine and feminine. Let that balance come alive in you.

Wayne Snellgrove

“Dangerous Times” <– Previous Post “Ego,self and anatta” Next Post –>

Books:- Treatise, Wai Zandtao Scifi, Matriellez Education.

Blogs:- Ginsukapaapdee, Mandtao, Matriellez.

Advertisements

Dangerous Times

Posted: 26/05/2018 by zandtao in Freedom, Insight, ONE planet, Struggle
Tags: ,

We are living in dangerous times, I am so deeply afraid for the future; I see nothing changing for the better.

Where is the direction of Gaia, Mother Earth? Where is the direction to end war? Where is the direction to end wage-slavery?

Nowhere.

Where is the direction now? Increasing repression through repression on both sides. Repression helps no-one because it makes no change. It simply covers over the cracks, it Grenfells – gentrifies. This increasing repression is polarising society, and we are not examining this polarisation because we are stuck in our own media bubbles. Understanding through detachment has been replaced by repression based on positions – moral or otherwise.

This aspect of repression started with what Jordan Peterson calls PC-authoritarianism. This man is part of a right-wing egotistical freedom movement who are very dangerous, and has been rightly criticised here. But however sound the criticism it doesn’t matter, our world is polarised and what is said in the NYT does not matter to those listening to Peterson. And what is worse the world is moving more to sympathy for Peterson’s right-wing egotism because the finance is there to support Peterson and the IDweb. Meanwhile the 1% exploit through a Trump facade.

We have not learnt the lesson of PC-authoritarianism. I am going to examine how I see the personal history of PC. Back in the 70s racist language was common-place, at that time it didn’t matter to most people that this language was offensive – offensive language was used in the presence of black people and black people were considered to have a chip if they didn’t accept it. Slowly things began to change in that repressing racist language and removal of racist images improved the general ethos. But it was never meant to be censorship alone, it was meant to be a two-pronged approach in which removal of poor use of language went hand-in-hand with how racism was harmful for everyone. However there wasn’t much effort put into the educational side, and when Blair got into power there was increased repression on the language without any effort being made towards education.

When people are repressed there is a pressure situation built up because the source of the problem had not gone away. These repressed people were still racist. On the surface the problem of racism had been sugarcoated but nothing had been done about the squalid racist mire underneath. As a result when they started funding the alt-right, out came the racists again. There are now increased racist attacks, and racist intellectuals barely bother to disguise themselves as in the IDWeb.

I spent many an hour discussing politics with a neighbour. He did not disagree with any of the issues I raised such as war, exploitation wage-slavery, the 1%, Wall Street. However his mind was so warped with racism that he occasionally expressed to me concerning the difficulties of employing Aborigine workers, and how his liberty was infringed by regulations that protected them. He was also strongly against PC-authoritarianism. These combined were sufficient as he turned out to be a Trump supporter. In other words his racism mattered more than anything else except the PC-police. Of course this is an ignorant position but Trump’s backroom staff knew that the root issue was racism. All the years in which there was some form of PC-ascendancy nothing was actually done about racism, it was only repressed and it is now back in full force in some communities.

Racism is now so strong that this form of state repression is acceptable. Trump says that he would like NFL owners to drop players who took the knee. Now they have agreed that there will be a penalty if players take the knee. This is fascism:-

I first began this blog thinking about this meme:-

I first thought this was great, but then … Is the meme asking that the nephew be educated as to why repeated “no” is harassment or just being told “don’t ask more than once”? Then I began thinking about the relationship thing. Relationship is not about politics, I know how much I hated it when I went home and got it in the neck from a partner who was angry and treated me as a representative of patriarchy – I benefit from the privilege of being a member of the imperialist, white supremacist patriarchy but in my home I can offer empathy; I would however liked to have been me.

Now what happens to this “nephew”? Maybe he is down, maybe it took a great deal to ask. Will the girl think about it, realise she made a mistake and ask him out? Rather than an opportunity to warn the nephew against possible harassment, isn’t this an opportunity to help promote good relationship? Maybe the mother (of the nephew) could involve the mother of the girl in discussion about how to promote relationship.

I don’t want the nephew to ask again, I want a society in which relationship can be built. Can mothers teach daughters to ask a boy out? Can this be done without the girl being perceived as a “slut”? Can we help our young people build relationship?

Or do we remain slaves to sets of ideals which create separation?

It also made me concerned about that ugly brute, male lust. We have reached the stage where right-wing egotistical patriarchs such as Jordan Peterson are attaching blame to women because men not in a relationship behave badly (see NYT article). Peterson is at least recognising the problem in part – the ugliness of male lust. Where are men taught to deal with this? It is a horrible brute, variable in that it is not the same in all men. Some women equate this ugly brute with their own desire; this might be true as I have no experience of how a woman experiences desire – but equally women have no experience of this ugly brute. In relationship all matters need to be brought to the table, discussed, and a mutual understanding be reached. Bringing idealism to the relationship table does not help. If men with Peterson ideals expect women to return to being pliant kitchen chattels, there is only oppression. If women expect men to behave by following a set of rules that they create, there is no relationship. In a heterosexual couple there are two people of the opposite genders seeking to form a relationship, this can only be achieved through mutual love, mutual respect and mutual enabling. Leave the rule book where it belongs.

And that is the problem with our dangerous times, we are allowing ourselves to be dominated by rule books. We need to live together through mutual love, mutual respect and mutual enabling. And to paraphrase Paulette Jordan, love of Gaia. I wish her so much luck, how can she hope to bring Unity in times which have been so intentionally divided.

What good people have to realise politically is that being correct is nowhere near enough, having good ideals is nowhere near enough, having compassion is nowhere near enough. The point is that the 1% have the power and money, they can pay for any form of violent support for what they do. Antifa can be squashed any day they want them to be squashed. The only power that we have as people is togetherness, black and white together, women and men together, using rules to divide us even if these rules might be correct only works in favour of the 1%. Science has proven climate change for decades, the Koch brothers have “faked” climate denial in just one. Who is winning? Find ways of working together. Unity for Gaia.

“Nowhere to hide” <– Previous Post “Indigenous yin/yang” Next Post –>

Books:- Treatise, Wai Zandtao Scifi, Matriellez Education.

Blogs:- Ginsukapaapdee, Mandtao, Matriellez.

Nowhere to Hide

Posted: 25/05/2018 by zandtao in Struggle
Tags: ,

I have been doing some light listening in the car – bell hooks, and it is excellent. I am MAWP so I am part of the imperialist white supremacist patriarchal system that she continually questions. When you listen to her you have to question what you are doing about race, and I have been complacent about that. Partly that complacency stems from living with black women who looked to me for knowledge on the struggles of black people, partly that complacency comes from things like the Young Journal, partly that complacency comes from learning from Ndeh and Omwody, and partly that complacency comes from being MAWP and knowing that whenever I want I can hide from the results of MAWPs. I can hide within the very imperialist white supremacist patriarchal system I hate. I have no skin that prevents me from hiding.

I compare bell with how I felt about Krishnamurti. When I was about 30 I spent a few years attending the Krishnamurti gatherings at Brockwood park. At that time I was focussed on spirituality trying to come to terms with my understanding, and I would listen as he would say empty your contents of consciousness. I would internally scream at him that I am trying to come to terms with understanding and yet you tell me empty. It was a permanent spiritual revolution, and needed.

Listening to bell is a permanent societal revolution, everything has to be questioned because it is imperialist white supremacist patriarchal. As a MAWP I am not going to have conflict because it is MAWPs who are the problem – apart from the 1% of which MAWPs are their foremen.

It is the state of permanent revolution which is the end of addiction to self Ch 22, it is permanent revolution that ends conditioning, it is permanent revolution that is the practice of Ch 23, and it is permanent revolution that is the pathtivism that I put forward in Ch 24:-

Listening to bell is comfortable because it unhinges any attachment I might have. If I am not agreeing with her – maybe thinking she goes too far, I can stop myself and say that is addiction to conditioning – and let it go.

She makes me evaluate class. That in itself is a good thing. Class is Marxist and therefore MAWP no matter how much socialists argue – ask Russell Means about Europeans. But at the same time the 99% are exploited and provided Gaia is happy somehow working for Unity against the 1% has to underpin the permanent non-violent revolution – unless it becomes legitimately violent and that is very very unlikely as realistically there will never be that level of consciousness amongst the 99%. Working with black comrades in a state of permanent revolution means constant deep listening as each new turn shows how MAWP I am, and how unintentionally I perpetuate the imperialist white supremacist patriarchal system simply by having the conditioning. This deep listening is of course completely liberating no matter how much my ego screams that I have much to offer.

I should think seriously about how to add permanent revolution to the practice of the Treatise. Will I wait and see if Holybooks comes through?

I know bell is Buddhist but she talks much of desire – and there was self esteem that I questioned. I have mixed reactions to her occasional focus on black women fulfilling their sexual desire. On the one hand it is a celebration of self-realisation but on the other it is indulging desire, and attachment to desire is addiction to self – and is therefore not following the path. Following the path is permanent revolution but most don’t have the awareness to follow the path; such celebration of self-realisation is an intermediary step.

“one Family” <– Previous Post “Dangerous Times” Next Post –>

Books:- Treatise, Wai Zandtao Scifi, Matriellez Education.

Blogs:- Ginsukapaapdee, Mandtao, Matriellez.

one Family

Posted: 21/05/2018 by zandtao in ONE planet
Tags:

Taken from The Great Mystery Wakan Tanka

“Time evolves and comes to a place where it renews again. There is first a purification time, then there is renewal time. We are getting very close to this time now.

We were told that we would see America come and go. In a sense, America is dying, from within because they forgot the instructions on how to live on Earth.

Everything is coming to a time where prophecy and man’s inability to live on Earth in a spiritual way will come to a crossroad of great problems. It’s the Hopi belief, it’s our belief, that if you are not spiritually connected to the Earth, and understand the spiritual reality of how to live on Earth, it’s likely you will not make it.

When Columbus came, that began, what we term as, the “First World War.” That was the true First World War – when Columbus arrived – because along with him came everybody from Europe. By the end of the Second World War we were in America, we were only 800,000. From 60 million to 800,000. So we were almost exterminated here in America.

Everything is spiritual. Everything has a Spirit. Everything, everything was brought here by the Creator, the one Creator. Some people call Him “God,” some people call Him “Buddha,” some people call Him “Allah,” some people call Him other names. We call Him “Concachilla”, “Grandfather.”

We’re here on Earth only a few winters. Then, we go to the Spirit World. The Spirit World is more real than most of us believe. The Spirit World is everything.

Over 95% of our body is water. And, in order to stay healthy, you’ve got to drink good water. When the European first came here, Columbus, we could drink out of any river. If the Europeans had lived the Indian way when they came, we would still be drinking out of rivers, because Water is sacred. The Air is sacred.

Our DNA is made of the same DNA as the tree. The tree breathes what we exhale. When the tree exhales, we need what the tree exhales. So we have a common destiny with the tree.

We are all from the Earth. And when Earth, Water and the Atmosphere is corrupted, then it will create its own reaction. Mother is reacting. In the Hopi prophecy they say the storms and floods will become greater.

To me, it’s not a negative thing to know that there will be great changes. It’s not negative, it’s evolution. When you look at it as evolution, it’s time. Nothing stays the same.

[In reference to a monkey] we always say, that might be your ancestor, but it’s not our ancestor. He is a relative, but not our ancestor.

You should learn how to plant something. That’s the first connection. You should treat all things as Spirit – realize that we are one Family.

It’s never something like “the End.” It’s like Life – there is no end to Life.”

Floyd Red Crow Westerman
(August 17, 1936 – December 13, 2007) Sioux muscian, actor and political activist for Native American causes.

“Love self esteem” <– Previous Post Next Post –>

Books:- Treatise, Wai Zandtao Scifi, Matriellez Education.

Blogs:- Ginsukapaapdee, Mandtao, Matriellez.

Love and Self-esteem

Posted: 19/05/2018 by zandtao in Insight, Struggle
Tags: , , , ,

In the car I have been listening to bell hooks, such an interesting writer. I have downloaded a series of audios on bell hooks – it is readings from several of her books. I had to check the USB because I wasn’t sure even though what was being said sounded like her. But there is a problem, unlike Russell’s conversation podcasts there is too much content for when I am driving.

But it is about love and self-esteem, and she said “go back to your childhood”. This is a strategy I like, and on love and self-esteem again I feel incredibly lucky. I have to assume as context what I have described in the , in this case especially Ch 21 – My Path. I am unwilling to be specific about my home as my mother would not have liked it, but I can describe it in general as I have in being middleclassed as described in the chapter on My Path. Characteristics of being middleclassed are emotional repression and a focus on education leading to house car and education for children. As I have said previously, from my upbringing I emerged middleclassed but, significantly, relatively undamaged and with sufficient bits of paper for passports into life. When I look around this is more than I could have asked for.

In terms of self-esteem being middleclassed makes it easy to understand. I had the arrogance of academic success and as the middleclass straitjacket only really measured this my self-esteem was well intact.

As for love, self-love and other issues that Bell discusses, in my childhood these were de rigueur. In middle-class homes there was love but it was not expressed as emotion, passion; it was expressed as the straitjacket. The first thing I did when I hit bottom was to run back to the straitjacket, this is what being middleclassed provided. When I went to uni I questioned this straitjacket because I was beginning to remove it, but now I don’t – it was a comfort. I cannot advocate the middleclassed home but all-in-all it served me well.

With regards to teen and young adult relationships I was incredibly shy and awkward – undoubtedly in part a product of being middleclassed. In my early teens I dropped opportunities for relationship learning until I left new possibilities behind as too difficult. At uni I was drunk and most undesirable. At these times wanting a relationship was a conditioned thing, it was expected to have one; the “alpha males” I looked up to at that time flitted through relationships (people I later derided as Martin Smoothchatter). I say this in part was due to my being middleclassed but I also feel the path saved me – no idea how the path did it. I can think back to times where my awkwardness prevented me from relating to some wonderful women, but women who that underdeveloped self would have adored and left that adoring self very distant from the path.

In terms of self-esteem I had that in spades because all that mattered was education. Self-love never rose at that time because I so identified with the self-esteem of academic success. But then came the upheaval that started me on the path (again I refer you to Ch 21 for details). As path is unconditional love, this of course changed everything – including with regards to relationship. I became the wandering compassion at the time confused in terms of conscious awareness, but driven by path I was just learning. To begin with love of an other wasn’t the priority although the conditioning to have a relationship was there, I still had the conditioning of the cosmic love of an other. This conditioning confused me especially as in terms of the world I was so immature but the path priority drove me through the conditioning; I still had my awkwardness that prevented formation of relationships.

Once I settled into teaching a self formed. This self was based in the path, I knew who I was and relationships happened because of who I was – the self that the path had formed. There were two women I loved, and they are important in understanding the love that is now me – now part of my path. My first love happened when the woman was still in a relationship. You have to remember that I was immature and did not understand the world. The three of us spoke about this love, my lover’s relationship fizzled out, and this erstwhile lover who I thought was a friend didn’t want to know me – I am sorry it was my immaturity. There were further barriers on my lover’s part in this love, and by the time she really started to respond to my love my love was waning. And my path and independence took over until the relationship petered out and she left London.

My second love was an absolutely intense disaster that I described as worse than Peyton Place. I deeply loved this woman and I got absolutely hammered by pain. By the end of the relationship of nearly three years I was very much an alcoholic – the relationship did not cause the drug dependency but made it worse, much worse. When we separated she still agreed to see me, but very rarely and that petered out after a further 2 or 3 years.

With both of these I had deeply loved an other, but neither lasted a lifetime. Love however did. I had experienced love and that experience meant I knew love, love was always there. And that love can best be described by this Eckhart Tolle meme:-

It was only when I was mature (since retirement) did I realise that I was grateful for how I came to know love. The pain of the second love had been internalised and lasted a long time. Maybe 8 years after the start of that relationship I was in Nyanga and managed to dig out a significant part of that pain, relived it and let it go. And then maybe three years ago I finally came to the realisation that I had loved, love was in me and that I was grateful for the women I had loved – especially the second one.

To return to Bell’s books. I never really had self love. Because I started on the path so young, there was the love that belonged to the path. The path and conditioning and lust took me into relationships (2 significant loving ones) – my path had not matured enough to go beyond this conditioning; remember, this is how I describe path:-

I never loved when I was still relating to self-esteem. When that self-esteem blew up in the upheaval there was path, I never had to love myself as Bell describes. Path is unconditioned love, to think about loving it is a dichotomy that just doesn’t apply. I developed a love of others, but the love of self didn’t apply because the path was beyond self – anatta – no-self. I can relate to the love Eckhart describes but Bell’s descriptions are based in self and in terms of love I bypassed that self mostly – I of course had self in other ways as described in Ch22 on addiction.

The following is speculation as I did not experience it. I want to try and relate to what Bell says – as she is my feminist guide. Because I was middleclassed I grew up with self-esteem but I was completely awkward – lacking in any self-esteem in terms of relationships. My conditioning turned me to drink at uni, and relationships became secondary. I had many passions, a combination of conditioning and intellectual constructs that I should love, and occasional near misses where I was lucky that my awkwardness did not allow adoration. And then came the path. I never needed self-love because I had the path. Self-love conceivably is a stage before anatta. Many never move to anatta, and self-love is an important instinct for survival as Bell describes. For me this is conjecture.

Because I loved, once the pain had passed there was conscious love in me; love that was always there emerged without much pain – intense pain for a short time.

“Native code of ethics” <– Previous Post “one Family” Next Post –>

Books:- Treatise, Wai Zandtao Scifi, Matriellez Education.

Blogs:- Ginsukapaapdee, Mandtao, Matriellez.

Native American Code of Ethics

Posted: 18/05/2018 by zandtao in ONE planet
Tags:

As part of my attempt at understanding “Being Gaia” I have been looking at indigenous wisdom:-

Here is a Native American Code of Ethics (click text image below):-

For me prayer is meditation, otherwise would that we could live by this code.

“Exploring Gaia” <– Previous Post “Love Self-esteem” Next Post –>

Books:- Treatise, Wai Zandtao Scifi, Matriellez Education.

Blogs:- Ginsukapaapdee, Mandtao, Matriellez.

Exploring Being Gaia

Posted: 18/05/2018 by zandtao in ONE planet
Tags:

The last words of the were “follow the path of Gaia”, I want to begin exploring more what that means. Throughout the Treatise there have been ideas of Unity and ONE planet, and the idea is integral to what the Treatise is about, but perhaps I need more meat on the bones.

I am wondering whether there needs to be a greater shift than what I have described in pathtivism Ch 24:-

Let’s consider the Russell Means use of the word “European”. I have discussed this before here, but I want to examine it again – I haven’t reread what I wrote. We have “Europeans” who are divided in proletariat and bourgeoisie. What divides people in these two classes – ownership of the means of production. Money.

In Ch 24 I argued that we must move away from the focus on money, Marxism could be described as greed for the proletariat vs greed for the bourgeoisie. Of course in today’s era the 1% have definitely dominated the class struggle, and their accumulation is probably far more than Marx ever imagined. As a European I want to struggle against the lynchpins of capitalism – war and wage-slavery, so I remain within the conditioning that I grew up with when I am involved in this class struggle. Through pathtivism I propounded moving away from this conditioning, and I am now suggesting we go further. It is not class struggle but struggle for Gaia. The class struggle only has integrity when it is fought within the paradigm of struggle for Gaia. Or as Naomi would describe it when being led by the indigenous – Love for Gaia.

When I worked in the mass movement trade unions were involved peripherally in wider struggles, in my time I liked to think there was an improved international focus. But when push comes to shove the trade unions were only interested in improved wages. In the NUT there were all kinds of education issues such as class size, workload, etc., but the only one all members were mobilised on was increased salaries as a result classroom issues continued. Whatever “Europeans” might say it was about money. Whatever “nice white people” say about caring what matters is their lifestyle – house, car education etc.

Here is a clip of indigenous people talking. Although as yet I don’t understand the “blood quantum” the issue is land. Because the issue is land and what the 1% can use to make profits, I see the demise of indigenous people. Some call this “the progress of civilisation”; I don’t see any progress, I just see the 1% taking for the sake of it. Whilst I support their rights to the land I see it as inevitable they will lose it, whatever delusions, legal or otherwise, the 1% will present us with they will take the land they want. Indigenous peoples will be assimilated when their lands have gone.

But what about their wisdom? This is the wisdom of Gaia, idappaccayata as Buddhadasa would say, this wisdom is so important. If we don’t try to practice this wisdom then we will suffer the consequences. I don’t see Gaia dying but I do see that Gaia could change so that humanity doesn’t survive; Gaia, life, could survive but humans don’t have to. We already see this change in climate, and because of investment this is now being denied. Therefore it will worsen.

Underlying all activism needs to be respect for Gaia. The 1% are expanding their accumulation at the expense of Gaia, we are being exploited at the same time. If we then demand more money without taking it from the 1% where does it come from? Each other or Gaia. Somehow for the sake of Gaia we have to end accumulation.

Focussing on greed alone only hurts Gaia, and is dangerous for all. The class struggle is sound because it is concerned with existing finance and production, but the 1% are continually expanding and the class struggle does not fight that. It needs to, I would argue that is the priority – prevention of expansion. Ending accumulation. Supporting ourselves – supporting Gaia; compassion, compassion for Gaia.

“Lasting Change” <– Previous Post “Native Code of Ethics” Next Post –>

Books:- Treatise, Wai Zandtao Scifi, Matriellez Education.

Blogs:- Ginsukapaapdee, Mandtao, Matriellez.

Lasting Change

Posted: 17/05/2018 by zandtao in Media, Struggle
Tags: ,


My niece posted a Zerlina Maxwell clip on her facebook page. In this clip Zerlina berates the rape culture which is prevalent in movies. However her examples were primarily 80s and 90s. In my view although things might appear to be better now in the movies, I wonder how much they are. Here is a view of the “adorkable misogyny” in The Big Bang Theory which suggests there is much to change.

There is no doubt that in my lifetime images of women in media have improved. I grew up on a diet of Carry On films and Benny Hill shows in which the white patriarchy’s portrayal of women was usually just as sex objects in which sexual titilation was turned into humour. Such humour would not now be accepted in mainstream, I believe – I don’t watch it. With the #metoo movement such a rape culture has been driven underground but I question whether it has gone. To answer that I wish to draw a parallel with race.

When I grew up overt racism was acceptable, racist language was commonplace and was used in good homes as well as bad. Back in the 70s the politically-correct movement started where it was recognised that the use of such language publicly should be stopped, and over time in the mainstream it was; I question whether it stopped in homes. However when this PC-movement for correcting language started it was recognised that there should be an educational movement attached to help people become aware of the deeper sources of racism. For people like myself to see Trevor Phillips be part of the Blair government (I wasn’t in the UK then) would have been a real sign of progress. However Trevor in a recent documentary, “Has political correctness gone mad”, questioned what has happened to PC (discussed here. I have my doubts about Trevor especially with his criticism of Muslims, but it all points to an improved position for black people.

Until Brexit in the UK and then Trump in the US. I would argue that the basis of both movements is racism, both personal and institutional. In other words the movement that started back in the 70s and 80s had not really helped white people not to be racist, but had just pushed that racism underground until it became publicly acceptable to be racist again. It is possible that the hate crimes we are now seeing are as “bad” as the hate I grew up with.

And the parallel I draw with the race issue is this. Public pressure could force sexism and rape culture underground but it could take little for that culture to go back to the surface again.

Currently race is used as a scapegoat in terms of their “taking our jobs”. That issue was addressed by the education of anti-racists but was not addressed by the PC-movement. The issue with jobs is that there are not sufficient jobs because the 1% are accumulating all the money rather than circulating it back into the economy with necessary jobs. Without examining this source of racism in the politics of the 1%-system there can be no genuine change. To me this has been evidenced by the re-emergence of a level of public racism that existed at the time I grew up.

I fear the current direction of the feminist movement, and I draw a parallel with terminology used by Bell Hooks – revolutionary feminism and reformist feminism. Reformist feminism recognises the right for women to have access to the same rights as men – perfectly legitimate, and then promotes an agenda of competing for jobs etc. – competing for the limited cake. But Bell then spoke of revolutionary feminism in which there was a fundamental change in the white patriarchal system. This is why her book is called “Feminism is for everybody” – without a fundamental systemic change – revolutionary feminism, #MeToo and Zerlina Maxwell will just be the contemporary fashion.

<– Previous Post “Reason and Decency” “Exploring Gaia” Next Post –>

Books:- Treatise, Wai Zandtao Scifi, Matriellez Education.

Blogs:- Ginsukapaapdee, Mandtao, Matriellez.

Reason and Decency

Posted: 16/05/2018 by zandtao in Insight

A friend recently lamented the loss of reason and decency “The most depressing thing politically for me is the retreat from reason and decency in current events”. This friend has always felt there are closer links between reason and action than I do.

To me there has been a retreat but not from reason and decency, that I never considered was there in politics, but a retreat from paying lipservice to these values. I am no defender of Clintons or Blair but they would pay lipservice to values.

I consider my people “nice white people”, and I have never considered that reason and decency to be characteristics of their voting patterns. Far from it their votes are based on fear delusion and lifestyle. They are frightened of change because they see change affecting their lifestyle, and believe traditional parties will provide economic stability. How they rationalise their voting when it comes to Trump and Brexit I have no idea.

Let me be clear, within their families and communities these “nice white people” are decent. As I have pointed out their voting is not reasonable, but other than politics I feel you could appeal to their reason. How do we encourage these people to change their voting patterns? These “nice white people” have always been in bed with war but they are now publicly in bed with deplorables – I understand that Clinton tactic that badly backfired. I don’t understand why the “nice white people” in the community I grew up in are not ashamed to be associated with deplorables. As I am not afraid of change I don’t understand why they are so afraid, but I do know they are.

I don’t understand how these “nice white people” accept moving away from paying lipservice. Maybe it is because they are older and still feel the fear of the Cold War, something I certainly grew up with. Maybe “Reds under the bed” is still attached to Corbyn and social activists. Maybe they see the deplorables as a passing phase.

I recently met an alt-right, and his mindset completely turned me. He was lacking in humility, compassion or any desire for human spirit. Whilst my community’s voting patterns are despicable, these are not people who lack compassion provided their lifestyle is not under threat. This alt-right guy threatened that. But ego-driven financial upstarts have always been accepted as a necessary evil by my community – I guess they somehow feel the system controls them. But this borderline-deplorable doesn’t in any way represent the people I grew up with. They would help each other, I don’t see this alt-right being helpful. Maybe he helps alt-rights.

Nice white people have a loose and varied relationship with religion, and this religion does provide some level of decency within the community – if you ignore their voting patterns.

As described in Ch 24 I do not see existing political activism having a future. The reason of right view cannot combat power. There might be a possibility of appealing to compassion and decency to change voting patterns, however their media will never accept that Corbyn is decent because he is lefty – a modern-day red under the bed.

Changing political activism from appealing to greed is not likely to happen, and if it does it will take time. My “nice white community” would always say they are compassionate – although that compassion does not extend to welcoming non-white neighbours.

The sentiments of my friend’s description of retreat I would agree with. How much worse the world will be without politicians having to pay lipservice to values I don’t know, but for me the world has changed for the worse in the last two years. Non-white communities in the West are suffering more harassment because decency is not publicly required – it used to be required publicly by PC-authoritarianism but censorship does not bring personal development as can now be seen.

But the real suffering in the world recently has been in the Middle East, I have no idea whether their suffering has worsened in the last two years. I fear it has.

I would support any calls for reason and decency to become mainstream even if it is hypocritical lipservice – I would support small mercies.

“Right-Wing Freedom” <– Previous Post “Lasting Change” Next Post –>

Books:- Treatise, Wai Zandtao Scifi, Matriellez Education.

Blogs:- Ginsukapaapdee, Mandtao, Matriellez.

Freedom has always been a right-wing issue but it confuses because right-wing freedom is not genuine freedom. Right-wing freedom is concerned with the demands for no restriction on the ego. Genuine freedom knows that the ego has to be disciplined INTERNALLY – not politically or governmentally, but these right-wing egotists are so addicted to their egos they do not see what is happening and are usually not interested in self-discipline – just blaming others for their ego being restricted.

Everything about me says there should be free speech, it is up to the individual to discern their own truths. As a principle this is great, in practice it produces the deplorables. And amongst the deplorables are people who would commit crimes against others based on racism, sexism, homophobia etc. As Liv (SVU) would say there are hate crimes.

Unfortunately PC-authoritarians have had some power recently -contributing to the creation of a backlash. Previously there was an unofficial code of conduct between left and right in which “decent” right people restricted the deplorables – as well as authoritarian liberals restricting them. But Trump and Brexit have undermined this code of conduct, and deplorables are coming out of their cesspits. Across the board there needs to be agreed limits to free speech to restrict hate crimes. Ideas should not be restricted but speech that leads to crime needs to be. For example I think Jordan Peterson is dangerous and PC-authoritarians would like to silence him. The success of people like JBP is an indictment of our education system – especially as our education system employs him. But he does not directly call for hate crimes and as such he has the right to talk, sadly the state of awareness of people at the moment means that he has a large audience.

General awareness of the 1% has increased so the genuine left-wing analysis of the 1% and its manipulations is now more common currency. In other words some of the analysis of these right-wing intellectuals started on the genuine left.

One scenario might be that when these intellectuals actually started listening they were ashamed and embarrassed at having been deluded. To overcome that delusion and to retain their arrogant egos they claimed the understanding of deep state and 1% as their own. But some of these types of intellectuals are not overly-educated, not overly-discerning. They don’t have the questioning and understanding of the manipulations of the 1%. Their egos demand of them that they have developed a new philosophy. This new philosophy assigns blame in the wrong areas because they are being manipulated. On the genuine left there is a clear analysis. It is not identity politics, it is not we are right others are wrong. It is just class. The 1% are exploiting people, our class, we must unite. No excuses, no blaming blacks, women, LBGQT, it is the 1% – be clear. Rabid individualism demands freedom for their egos, freedom from repression, freedom from regulation, freedom from government, and this freedom has no direction, no compassion, no humanity, just freedom for the ego. Because the ego has blocked off their compassion, it is just freedom to be headless chickens.

As an example of the less educated headless chickens I recall a year discussing politics on-and-off with a neighbour. He agreed with some things but showed racism towards Aborigines and Muslims; he also showed anger towards PC-authoritarianism. It was clear some of his views were right-wing and I tried to warn him about media he was listening to. Then he turned out to be a Trump supporter. I was horrified and we now don’t talk – down to me. How did I miss it? I feel his racism and anger at the PC-brigade made him Trump – I often have to listen to white people being racist in a limited way and in the past that racism had never been manipulated into such right-wing extremism as Trump. His evaluation of the sources of the problems as being 1% were in agreement with mine. How can he not see that Trump is a 1%-puppet? I still don’t know. But after I stopped talking with him, I went back one time and asked about Trump. He told me Trump was still learning and give him a chance, but he blamed the Democrats for the failure of Trump’s health care. This is the power of the media he watches. He evaluated the state of the world in the same way as I did – he feared it was getting worse and saw foreign interference as a problem. How did he then accept Trump? This is the power of the media he watches.

For him Crooked Hillary is far worse. I dislike Hillary because she is part of neoliberalism, and I am never going to know whether the name “crooked” has any legitimacy. For me democrats are still backing her, and that shows me how neoliberal the machine is; crooked or not politically she should be dropped. However much she has been smeared, there is no compassion or decency, but as neither value matters she might still be running. Of course neoliberals choose Trump over Bernie, they cannot have Bernie – and maybe there is no-one else.

Unity is a key flagstone as a left-wing platform as compared with the freedom of the individual on the right. I call for compassion to be another to counter the ego but it surprised me that JBP actually comes out against compassion. Compassion for me means freedom from suffering for all. Whilst we have a 1%-system that restricts global resources because of their personal accumulation (1%), what nature would provide for 100% has been greatly reduced by this accumulation and so created confrontation (people fighting for the limited cake). Such confrontation leads to individualism as each fights for the cake. These individuals believe they gain more by their own greed than any disciplining towards compassion or acceptance of collective agreement.

There is an international dark web and Jordan Peterson is listed on a website – features prominently. These people are not uneducated, in fact the opposite they are overly-miseducated and driven in part by their academically successful egos. They are sufficiently coalesced that they merit discussion at the New York Times. Here is a clip from Films for Action, I didn’t like the clip but it is suggesting that this IDWeb is a collection of people whose commonality is they don’t like Marxism.

Being intellectual and knocking Marxism has always been there, it is this ego and right-wing freedom. When I was an activist I always accepted as representative to do things in terms of my role and not because I believed them, comrades like me referred to this as discipline. In the spiritual world we need control of our egos and this is referred to as discipline. If there is no discipline the intellectual goes off all over the place, and that appears to be the IDWeb. Marxism is about the class, and the class does not put intellectualism first. The class for me is about compassion, and this means freedom from suffering for all. Hence the conflict for the IDWeb. It is quite understandable to consider that these intellectuals would appropriate some left-wing ideas such as deep state without having the consistent base that is class analysis. This is an intellectual approach.

It is worth talking here of “collective anarchism”, a term I came up with in The Arico Chronicles. It amuses me that I came up with it in fiction but the notion that collectivism and individuality needs to have a yin-yang relationship is reasonable. The political theory anarcho-syndicalism has a similar ring. Individual rights have to be protected, are not being protected under PC-authoritarianism which is little more than censorship, but in the end freedom from suffering-for-all has to be the objective – NOT freedom for the individual especially the individual ego.

There is the Dark Money Network and the IDWeb, the connection is that the 1% does not want Marxism and collectivism. How the money flows where, I don’t know but it does – it has to these people are there. If there is an anti-class confusion then the money has done its work. It is all very frightening:-

We are people we are class we share compassion. Activists, be compassionate first

“Not make enemies”– Previous Post Next Post –>

Books:- Treatise, Wai Zandtao Scifi, Matriellez Education.

Blogs:- Ginsukapaapdee, Mandtao, Matriellez.